|
Post by [USP] -Taft- on Dec 22, 2006 9:40:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by [USP] -Taft- on Dec 23, 2006 12:14:36 GMT -5
Some more new ones Which one do you think looks best?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2006 12:24:52 GMT -5
the first one, the others have too much black and white contrast, but i like the contrast is the colored one
|
|
|
Post by IceboyForHire on Dec 23, 2006 13:02:22 GMT -5
the brushing is getting old man, no offense, but u have to get some better brushes and use those, i can see 5 out of the 8 sigs that u have done that have the same brushes used.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2006 14:46:24 GMT -5
instead of brushes get c4d renders, but that might be a little advanced
|
|
|
Post by [USP] -Taft- on Dec 24, 2006 10:26:28 GMT -5
Yeah I'm not that good with Photoshop.. I just got it redownloaded it. Haven't had it for a year or two I'm still kind of choppy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 24, 2006 12:41:53 GMT -5
just keep practicing taft
and your not the only one................ that has the same brushes and backgrounds in 40 out of 45 of his sigs... lol
|
|
|
Post by [USP] -Taft- on Jan 14, 2007 12:09:55 GMT -5
I tried some c4d renders and this is the new sig that i have
|
|
|
Post by el JOKER5 on Jan 14, 2007 12:38:30 GMT -5
i like taft....but i would throw some effect on the text.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2007 14:46:54 GMT -5
nice taft!, what i would do is add some depth on the sides where it starts to get dark by adding an abstractgrunge brush with low opacity
|
|
|
Post by [USP] -Taft- on Jan 15, 2007 13:16:16 GMT -5
Yeah the text was just put on there for text, but yeah.
|
|