|
Post by .Bunk. on Apr 28, 2006 14:33:20 GMT -5
This site has a playable movie regarding the 9/11 conspiracy. It is hosted via google video if you wanna download it. But I think it's just easier to watch streaming. Crazy shit and I aint even watch the whole thing yet. www.radiofreesrini.com/
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2006 18:28:41 GMT -5
i watched it, pretty interesting, and mysterious
|
|
|
Post by el JOKER5 on Apr 28, 2006 19:53:20 GMT -5
i'll check it out bunk..u know im into this as much as u.
|
|
|
Post by .Bunk. on Apr 29, 2006 23:16:54 GMT -5
These shits is crazy.
|
|
|
Post by .Bunk. on Apr 29, 2006 23:18:39 GMT -5
If you download the Google video player and install it on your puter you can download the movies to you pc for on the go watching, they evel let you download them for PSP and Ipod Video.
|
|
|
Post by .Bunk. on May 16, 2006 23:38:05 GMT -5
Release of New Pentagon Video Designed to Frame The Debate
Infowars.com | May 16 2006 By Alex Jones & R. Schlickeisen
This release of a handful of frames from the Pentagon on 9/11 is a scam. It is another scam in a long line of false flags and distractions laid out by the real perpetrators of the events of September 11th. It is an attempt to regain control of the debate when so many people worldwide are waking up to the stone cold truth - the irrefutable evidence of what really happened on 9/11.
And of course it is blurry video, just as bad or worse than first five frames released by the government but it doesn't matter because the general public will hear that video of the plane hitting the Pentagon has been released and will not question it even if they haven't seen it. This is a device used to simply intensify the whole debate about the attack on the Pentagon to the exclusion of other important issues. We will debate what they want us to debate, the puppetmasters think.
Whether or not a plane hit the Pentagon has become a divisive issue within the 9/11 Truth community. Infowars has never chosen to focus on it because the evidence surrounding the explosions in the Pentagon do not compare to the ironclad evidence we have about other aspects of 9/11. All we have to help us understand what happened at the Pentagon is a handful of blurry frames handed over to us by the government while we have one hundred percent verification that Larry Silverstein ordered WTC building 7 to be demolished - the evidence came straight from his own mouth.
We know for a fact that the hijackers were trained at the Defense Language School.
We know for a fact that public officials were warned in advance of the attacks not to fly.
We know for a fact that NORAD stood down on the morning of 9/11.
We know for a fact that documents outlining plans for flying remote controlled aircraft into government buildings as a means of inciting war, such as Operation Northwoods, have been in circulation within the Pentagon for decades.
These smoking guns, these incredible pieces of evidence, have all been ignored by the mainstream media and government mouthpieces. It is no coinicidence that they have chosen to focus on the Pentagon. This is the reason that we know that the Pentagon debate is dangerous because the debate has been manufactured to distract from the facts.
Charlie Sheen issued a challenge to the media and to the public at large to examine the facts and look at WTC Building 7 and the five frames of the Pentagon. The media subsequently ignored this challenge, ridiculed and demonized Sheen and finally has embraced these new videos of the pentagon which are even more ridiculous than the initial "evidence" of a plane hitting the Pentagon.
All of this should show people that 9/11 was a manufactured event, carefully orchestrated to allow people to consider only what those in control want people to consider.
They cannot address the other evidence without hinting at the facts of the scam, so they concentrate on the Pentagon.
This is an obvious setup and we believe that within a few months they will release crystal clear footage and place all the weight of the 9/11 conspiracy on that video.
If this is such a trap, then we must warn people and alert them to the layers of manipulation at play here. We must show others the irrefutable evidence that the media purposefully ignores. We must reveal how this is the most heinous self-inflicted wound, the most vile false-flag operation ever perpetrated by a government on its own people.
|
|
|
Post by .Bunk. on May 16, 2006 23:38:48 GMT -5
Release Of Pentagon Images Direct Assault On 9/11 Truth Movement Politically timed release also coincides with Bush record low approval and surveillance furore, but video stills show little
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | May 16 2006
UPDATE: MSNBC's Pete Williams is reporting that the newly released video is a series of frames that are similar to some previously released video frames showing a fireball exploding on a exterior wall of the Pentagon. The new video frames show the same fireball exploding from a different angle. It supposedly only shows "the tip of the plane which may not be enough to satisfy the conspiracy theorist," says Williams.
The release of new video images of Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon is both a direct assault against a 9/11 truth movement that has flourished in recent months and an attempt to reinforce the attendant propaganda of 9/11 in light of Bush's 29% approval rating.
Before the release of the new frames news networks immediately went on the attack, saying that the images finally put to rest "conspiracy theories" and questions about the official story. In addition, Fox News commentators related with pensive looks and pursed lips that this footage answers the furore over secret NSA wiretaps and surveillance by 'reminding Americans why it was being done'.
VIDEO - BREAKING: Government Releasing 911 Video of Pentagon Crash
Video in Windows Media format
CNN's Barbara Starr is reporting that a court has ordered the Pentagon to release Pentagon surveillance video from 9/11 that shows AA flight #77 hitting the building. Judicial Watch has pursued this video in the courts for several years.
Barbara Starr expects that this video will answer some questions and suspicions that have circulated (largely on the internet) since 9/11. This video release on includes the Pentagon 's surveillance cameras. It does not include other surveillance video that were confiscated from local business after the 9/11 attack.
Fox anchors also attacked Charlie Sheen's 'ridiculous assertions' after the actor went public with his 9/11 doubts in late March.
Alex Jones and this website have always approached the Pentagon subject with caution because we were wary that it was a potential honey pot that would be used to distract and later discredit the 9/11 truth movement.
We asked why mainstream hit pieces always seemed to obsess over the Pentagon issue while ignoring other far weightier facets of the 9/11 inside job evidence.
The tactic has always been to create a straw man argument that can be set up and knocked down at a convenient time.
This is also a political boon for President Bush. The timing is precise and has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that the Moussaoui trial has ended. Bush's approval ratings are at 29% and his administration is being battered from pillar to post over the NSA spying scandal. What better time to replay the horror of 9/11 and attempt to reinforce fealty to the government's lauded efforts to keep us all safe from terrorists by taking our rights away?
The release of these images comes at a time when the 9/11 truth movement is at its most prominent. This is a targeted assault intended to quash questions about 9/11 and discredit the movement. TV news anchors are already uniform in their talking points in using the video images to attack 9/11 skeptics.
What remains clear is the fact that news networks are steadfast to ask questions about the real issues surrounding 9/11, such as the implosion of Building 7, the NORAD stand down and the fact that all the evidence points towards the hijackers being US government agents.
|
|
|
Post by .Bunk. on May 16, 2006 23:41:23 GMT -5
Pentagon Video Is Giant Psy-Op Intended to create circus of interest around 'no plane' theories, later debunk them
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | May 16 2006
Grainy video stills showing what is claimed to be the nose cone of Flight 77 will only result in an increased circus of debate around the issue of what happened at the Pentagon in preparation for a future release of clear video footage that 'debunks' people who question the official version of 9/11.
For over four years we have remained neutral on the subject, agreeing that unanswered questions need to be explored but warning against the Pentagon issue becoming the core focus of the 9/11 truth movement.
The danger is clearly that the government will use its media mouthpieces in particular Fox News to hype this until it becomes the de facto keystone of alternative explanations behind 9/11.
At the point when that crescendo reaches its peak crystal clear footage of Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon will be released, knocking down the straw man argument that the establishment itself erected.
The government is steam valving this issue so as to garner as much interest as possible before blowing the entire matter out of the water. We know for a fact that the FBI seized the gas station camera footage and footage from hotels across the highway which would show the entire sequence of events and prove exactly what happened at the Pentagon.
The fact that they have again chosen to release grainy and foggy images which only lead to more speculation tell us two things.
1) The government truly is frightened to death of releasing any images which accurately depict what happened at the Pentagon because it doesn't jive with the official version of 9/11.
2) Or the government knows that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon and has clear footage of the incident, but is deliberately releasing these speculative images in order to stoke the debate so it can later release the high quality video and use it to debunk the entire 9/11 truth movement.
The media obsession with this one facet of an entire smorgasbord of 9/11 questions, and their refusal to address more hardcore 9/11 evidence, leads us to fear the latter explanation is the case.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why no discussion of Building 7 and the comments of Larry Silverstein?
Why no discussion of the hijackers being trained by the US government? Lt. Colonel Steve Butler of the Monterey Defense Language Institute was suspended from duty after he accused Bush of allowing 9/11 to happen.
Why no discussion of the NORAD stand down?
Because none of these issues are honey pots, none of them are speculation because the cards are laid out on the table for everyone to see and the evidence is clear.
While intelligent questions need to be asked about what really happened at the Pentagon we feel that research in this context should come with the proviso that a potential trap is being laid to discredit all 9/11 research at a later date, and that today's story is part of that process.
|
|
|
Post by [USP] -Adams- on May 18, 2006 9:29:07 GMT -5
This has all given me a very sick feeling in my stomach; if this is true makes you wonder if we should be proud to be associated with this government.
|
|
|
Post by .Bunk. on May 18, 2006 10:20:11 GMT -5
After some of the shit I've seen, I dont trust them. No way.
|
|
|
Post by USPReagan on May 18, 2006 13:52:24 GMT -5
Holy shit, they got away with killing our sitting presdent 40 years ago, and we're just NOW speculating on their honesty?
|
|
|
Post by SMALLY.BIGZ on May 18, 2006 17:32:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by .Bunk. on Sept 8, 2006 17:48:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by [USP] -Adams- on Sept 9, 2006 7:44:33 GMT -5
just another log on the fire
|
|